Debtor filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' non-dischargeability complaint against him. The complaint included by reference a claim made against debtor in an Arizona state court that alleged breach of contract, and both negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation. The court found that, to the extent plaintiffs' claim was for non-dischargeability, the court had subject matter jurisdiction over it. However, if plaintiffs wished to pursue other claims as well, they would first need to seek relief from stay. Plaintiffs were ordered to amend their complaint to assert only claims that were properly before the bankruptcy court.